Glava I. Predposylki vozniknovenii︠a︡ russkogo neoleĭbnit︠s︡ianstva -- Glava II. G. Teĭkhmi︠u︡ller i I︠U︡rʹevskai︠a︡ shkola -- Glava III. A.A. Kozlov i S.A. Alekseev (Askolʹdov) -- Glava IV. Ierarkhicheskiĭ personalizm N.O. Losskogo -- Glava V. N.V. Bugaev i Moskovskai︠a︡ filosofsko-matematicheskai︠a︡ shkola -- Glava VI. Spiritualizm L.M. Lopatina i Moskovskoe psikhologicheskoe obshchestvo -- Glava VII. Kriticheskai︠a︡ monadologii︠a︡ P.E. Astafʹeva -- Glava VIII. Pozdnee russkoe neoleĭbnit︠s︡ianstvo.

The article deals with some items of Gödelian time travel problem well-known as an illustration of a specific kind of causality paradox. Its first part presents “the travel into the past” according to several recent physical hypotheses, which, from theoretical standpoint, seem to make such an idea possible. The familiar concept of backward causation is also discussed; we need to accept and develop it, if we wish to escape this type of time-travel paradoxes. The second part of the contribution is (...) devoted to philosophical interpretations of the precedence in order of cause and effect, and of the relation between temporal and causal order. The author claims, that if we wish to save coherent picture of nature, it is necessary to revise the concept of causality to make it compatible with the concept of backward causation. (shrink)

Scholarly attempts to analyze the history of science sometime suffer from an imprecise use of terms. In order to understand accurately how science has developed and from where it draws its roots, researchers should be careful to recognize that epistemic regimes change over time and acceptable forms of knowledge production are contingent upon the hegemonic discourse informing the epistemic regime of any given period. In order to understand the importance of this point, I apply the techniques of historical epistemology to (...) an analysis of the place of the study of astrology in the medieval and early modern periods alongside a discussion of the “language games” of these period as well as the role of the “archeology of knowledge” in uncovering meaning in our study of the past. In sum, I argue that the term “science” should never be used when studying approaches to knowledge formation prior to the seventeenth century. (shrink)

Ch. 1. Filosofskoe osmyslenie kulʹtury -- ch. 2. Problemy mnozhestvennosti kulʹtur.

[Philosophy of Nature of St. Thomas Aquinas:. Nature, the Universe, Man].

В сборнике представлены статьи, посвященные проблеме построения социальной онтологии общества различия. Для студентов, аспирантов, преподавателей философии и всех интересующихся проблемами современной философии.

T. 1. 1907-1909 -- T. 2. 1909-1914 -- T. 3. 1914-1917.